drydem: (Default)
drydem ([personal profile] drydem) wrote2004-04-12 12:05 pm

(no subject)

is the term postmaster general in opposition to postmaster specific or postmaster lieutenant?
Same question for surgeon general?

[identity profile] princess706.livejournal.com 2004-04-12 10:10 am (UTC)(link)
i always thought it was in charge of, but has no underlings

[identity profile] fallen-scholar.livejournal.com 2004-04-12 11:04 am (UTC)(link)
It's a Romance language thing, like Court Martial, where because the term came from the French (or, if I'm not mistaken in the above instances, America's Best Francophile, Franklin) where the adjective is preserved after the noun. Mind you I might be wrong on that.

[identity profile] hahahello.livejournal.com 2004-04-12 12:04 pm (UTC)(link)
It has a kind of military connotation to it, even though it is a civilian position. It is the 'general' in command of the post office. It is a very old tradition that has lost its original meaning, much the same way that a 'sergeant'--meaning, literally, "servant"--is no longer an officer's servant. BTW, what's the status of that Traveller game?

[identity profile] drydem.livejournal.com 2004-04-12 03:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Right now, it's waiting for the end of this week, to get to the point where I'm no longer insane.