(no subject)
Apr. 18th, 2005 04:06 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
After a discussion with
bneuensc I realized that I am having trouble escaping the mindset from Sunday. Sunday at the kingdom game, I played an individual of complete perspective, who took into account all possible variables in an attempt to understand everything that was going on around him. He had an uncanny ability to observe patterns in the world around him and used that ability to allow him to act intelligently, efficiently and effectively.
Today, I am having problems divorcing this perspective from my own life. In thinking about my academic life, I am increasingly convinced that I know nothing. I have been thinking about my paper on LiveJournal icons, which I like to think is good in some respects, but utterly fails to take into account the work of Roman Jakobson, which, now that I've been reminded of Jakobson, is entirely necessary to displaying the ways in which icons are deployed. It just makes me feel dumb, like I've failed to take into account information that I've been told before, if only in passing. I feel like I don't understand ideas that I want to incorporate more fully into my own work, like Lacan's Real/Symbolic/Imaginary divides, or de Saussure's concepts of language, or Foucault's notions of power. I feel dumb.
And, to some degree, I realize that I am holding myself to an unfair standard of perfection, that certainly nobody expects me to understand absolutely everything and express it with pure clarity. But sometimes I wish they did. Looking at my Master's thesis now, I want to burn it and start over. I want to take all I've learned in the past two years and completely rewrite the damn thing, taking into account a better understanding of formalism and the ethnography of speaking. I feel ashamed that I thought it was good work, I feel like I have shown the faculty how dumb I am by even suggesting that it was good enough for a M.A.
I am a perfectionist in some ways. I feel that in every situation there is a perfection for which we should strive. If you aren't trying to do it completely perfectly, then why are you trying at all? But in the end, I need to accept the fact that I am not omniscient and move on.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Today, I am having problems divorcing this perspective from my own life. In thinking about my academic life, I am increasingly convinced that I know nothing. I have been thinking about my paper on LiveJournal icons, which I like to think is good in some respects, but utterly fails to take into account the work of Roman Jakobson, which, now that I've been reminded of Jakobson, is entirely necessary to displaying the ways in which icons are deployed. It just makes me feel dumb, like I've failed to take into account information that I've been told before, if only in passing. I feel like I don't understand ideas that I want to incorporate more fully into my own work, like Lacan's Real/Symbolic/Imaginary divides, or de Saussure's concepts of language, or Foucault's notions of power. I feel dumb.
And, to some degree, I realize that I am holding myself to an unfair standard of perfection, that certainly nobody expects me to understand absolutely everything and express it with pure clarity. But sometimes I wish they did. Looking at my Master's thesis now, I want to burn it and start over. I want to take all I've learned in the past two years and completely rewrite the damn thing, taking into account a better understanding of formalism and the ethnography of speaking. I feel ashamed that I thought it was good work, I feel like I have shown the faculty how dumb I am by even suggesting that it was good enough for a M.A.
I am a perfectionist in some ways. I feel that in every situation there is a perfection for which we should strive. If you aren't trying to do it completely perfectly, then why are you trying at all? But in the end, I need to accept the fact that I am not omniscient and move on.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-18 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-18 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-18 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-18 03:09 pm (UTC):)
and for the record, I think you're brilliant, Ben.
-Sara-
no subject
Date: 2005-04-18 04:25 pm (UTC)And don't trash your Master's Thesis. It's inevitable to look back and say 'I know better now.' Think of it instead as the first step in a lifelong relationship with the scholarship about a complex of traditions you enjoy.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-18 05:04 pm (UTC)I'm warning you.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-18 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-18 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-18 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-18 10:15 pm (UTC)As if I know anything about taking things seriously...
Date: 2005-04-19 10:13 pm (UTC)Be yourself, find your niche, and fight those ever-bothersome urges to obsess.
At the same time, don't be too proud to revise or publish corrections to things, whatever the medium. Look at Moorcock; he's thouroughly revised things in re-publication and codefication of his stories (which originally appeared in British SF mags in the 60s and 70s). Sometimes things are a little more complicated, and may be motivated only by perfectionistic tendencies; be vigilant against such things lest your original expression be compromised for the sake of indulging your neurosis.
all the best,
A.