drydem: (Default)
[personal profile] drydem
So, in my dissertation, I have a short section on Zora Neale Hurston and I'm having a lot of trouble with using the word negro. While it is a term that Hurston uses and is historically appropriate to what she was seeking, it still is kind of twinge worthy for me as a word, given the way in which it represents a phase of American history marked by official disenfranchisement of African American voters and the perpetration of horrible acts of intimidation and violence upon them. As is, I use the term but have a footnote about why. What do people think about this as an approach?

Date: 2008-03-10 11:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wadam.livejournal.com
I think that having a footnote about why you use the term is perfectly acceptable. It's something that it never would have occurred to me to do, but I suppose that writing about my research requires using the term so much that it's kind of become normalized for me. But now that you mention it, perhaps I have a footnote in my future as well.

Profile

drydem: (Default)
drydem

October 2018

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910 111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 08:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios